The Al-Awlaki Question

After listening to the statement released by Anwar Al-Awlaki, questions have arose about who he really is. A patsy, a handler, an agent? The fact is the one who follows the government’s myth about 9/11 must be questioned, since any person of a real mind will question the myth.
Al-Awlaki’s previous works were very good, he spoke of the after life, the biography the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and his Companions. However, since he spoke of Umar Farouk, the christmas day bomber, as being an operation of Al-Qaida and Al-Qaida is a CIA operation and the State Department already admitted that this operation was protected by them…then it stands to reason the Al-Awlaki is either ignorant or an operative.
The language he uses in the aforementioned release shows that he is, in all likelihood, an agent. Everything that he said was to show that the U.S. is a tyrant, which it is, yet the attack of Muslims against innocent civilians is against the shariah. When a tyrant is attacking then the shariah allows a fair fight. If that same tyrant attacks civilians then the shariah only allows fighting the army, paramilitary forces or police. There is absolutely no room for the oppressed to kill civilians of the oppressing country. The philosophy of “good for the goose” is completely antithetical to Islam and I have no doubt that the Prophet, peace be upon him, will disavow completely “what Usama has done.” And, in fact, there is a Hadith in which the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, said exactly that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s